Paul
Roberts has successfully explained what not to do in How to Say Nothing in 500 Words when writing an essay. Especially
to avoid said essay returning with a glaring “D” at the top. Yet most of the
text was spent doing just that; telling us what not to do. There were boatloads of examples of the wrong way to go
about producing a promising paper. Granted, Roberts wanted to be thorough, sixteen
examples of clichés were not necessary. A published linguist should know that
when it comes getting the point across, simplicity is efficiency. If he
intended to help students write a better thesis, it may have been more useful
if the reader was given ways to spruce up a paper rather than being told what
drags it down. For someone who may have been accustomed to using the “obvious
content” and “pat expressions”, they cannot casually flip a switch and know
what to do when what is wrong is all they have been told. The few samples
Roberts includes that elaborate on what to
do are much more effective. The use of descriptive words in the terrible tale
of Alfred Simkins, gives a great idea of what can be done to better one’s writing.
Unfortunately, most other positive ideas are vague in instruction. Maybe it is
the way it is being worded. Maybe Roberts expects students to know these “do’s”
and “do not’s” already. If someone does not, they may feel slightly left out or
unintelligent when seeking aid from this text. The concepts mentioned are too
hit-or-miss to help a student that is only hearing them for the first time. Either
they understand it and fix it, or they are even more lost than before. One
cannot become the most creative being overnight simply from reading an essay in
which the author tells them what not to write.
No comments:
Post a Comment