Monday, September 1, 2014

Response to: Okinawa: The Bloodiest Battle of All by William Manchester

William Manchester reflects on his own knowledge and experience in war. Okinawa: The Bloodiest Battle of All is told from his point of view and is written in first person. Even though Manchester mentions other battles, the essay focuses mainly on the relationship between the United States and Japan. His diction is used so that people with only a basic understanding of war can understand and connect to what he is saying. He even states that most Americans have no idea what war is actually like, and do not know what they are celebrating on veteran holidays. “Very rarely are they honoring what actually happened, because only a handful know,” (Manchester 15) even those that wear a uniform. Those who do know have seen that battle is not as glamorous as everyone may think. The scars it leaves are deep and can last forever. The author has experienced this first hand. Manchester tells of a time after the battle that he met with a man who was almost his enemy at some point. Both of them thought it would be fine, but ended up leaving almost immediately upon seeing each other. Old feelings die hard, but that does not mean that respect is lost. The essay also includes a multitude of facts and statistics that boost the logos. Also, since numbers are something everyone can understand and feel, the pathos is influenced as well. Manchester effectively uses his own experience to build up his credibility. All in all, the rhetoric of the essay is sufficient.



Map of Okinawa, Japan.

No comments:

Post a Comment