In this
short essay by Stephen Cave, the concept of the daily balance of life and death
are contemplated. Cave begins with a narrative section in which he describes a
time when he accidentally killed a fly. He then addresses the fact that the
audiences’ opinions of him at the time are most likely divided between those
who think the death was insignificant, and those who think of him as a
murderer. In another narrative section, Cave mentions the life cycle of frogs
from the time they are eggs, to tadpoles, to finally frogs, and how the many
deaths along the way are necessary for any pond’s life to flourish. I do not
think he is trying to prove that death or life are good or bad, but he is
trying to qualify that both are necessary and “are obligate symbionts, each
wholly dependent on the other,” (paragraph 8). Cave then goes to addresses the
ideas of Veganism and how it is very anti-death, as well as him not being the
only person to feel negatively about the death of a fly and write about it. He
uses the example of a poet by the name of William Blake and his short poem that
sprung from a time when he too killed a fly by accident. This shows that the
feelings of empathy occasionally associated with the unintentional killing of a
popularly thought insignificant creature is not uncommon.
No comments:
Post a Comment